Who to Root for: Week 10

Written by Luke Dunlevy on .

There are two huge games in the NFL this week, and not much else matters.  The Colts host one of the games.  The other is for supremacy in the AFC North.  Let's take a look at Week Ten while I prepare myself emotionally for tonight. 

Easy calls

Denver at Washington:  The Broncos are looking to avoid a three game losing streak.  Think Denver can't lose to the hapless Redskins?  I think they can. 

Jacksonville at New York (A):  This games seems like a joke, right?  Not really.  Let's say the Jets win this afternoon, and the Colts win tonight.  That sets up a huge game next week in New England.  The Jets would be one game back with the tiebreaker in hand. 

Philadelphia at San Diego:  The Chargers won't win the AFC West with a .500 record again.  They need this game badly.  Denver has a couple L's left on it schedule, but they likely won't be worse than an 10 win team.  Losing this game would put San Diego in a must win position at Denver next week.  I'll be rooting against the Chargers -- hard.

Tough calls

Cincinnati at Pittsburgh:  Rooting for Cincy seems obvious to most of us.  The only problem is their schedule gets pretty easy for the next three weeks (@Oak, CLE, DET) before getting tricky to close out (@Min, @SD, KC, @NYJ).  Pittsburgh has a weak closing schedule with the exception of playing a questionable Baltimore team twice.  The bottom line is I think the winner of this game will have a good chance of finishing 13-3.  So it comes down to which stadium I'd rather visit in the playoffs -- and that is not a tough call.

AFC Playoff Standings

Indianapolis (8-0)

Denver (6-2)

New England (6-2)

Cincinnati (6-2)

Pittsburgh (6-2)

San Diego (5-3)

Houston (5-4)

Let the Memory Live Again

Written by Nate Dunlevy on .

I usually worry when I wake up with an email from JC in my inbox.

I never know what semi-coherent drunken rant is awaiting me.

I'm never tempted to ignore those emails, for one simple reason.  Sometimes, they have great ideas.

So was it this week when he suggested we open the floor to 18to88.com readers to share their favorite memories of the Colts/Pats series. The result was a good read and a lot of fun.  So click here to see everyone's favorite moments were from the rivalry that renews tonight.

It struck me as I read what everyone wrote how many people share in the big moments even when they are far from Indianapolis.  Indy is home to me in a way that no other place I live ever could be.  At any given moment in my life, that's where I'd rather be.  Every week, the Colts bring me home for a few hours, and they've come to mean more to me now than they even did when I went to every game.  Judging by the responses, a lot of people feel the same way.

The article will be permanently stored in the Fixtures sidebar.  Feel free to keep sending in your favorite memories, and I'll add them to the list.

I sure hope someone has something good and new to send me tomorrow.

Help a brother out

Written by Nate Dunlevy on .

I got this email in my inbox today:

Rob in Cincinnati writes:

I'm a Bengals fan from Cincinnati, who also roots for the Colts and despises the Patriots. Anyway, I'm bringing a huge Colts fan to the game against the Patriots game this Sunday, and I've been trying to look up things to do before the game. I've been searching to find a few ideas.

I don't think we are going to do the whole tailgating thing but were looking for a restaurant/sports bar we could watch some football in before heading to the game. Is there anything within walking distance of the stadium, anyplace you'd recommend?

I'm not sure if this is the right place to send an email asking for tips but I can't find much more info anywhere else.
Thanks

GO COLTS

We'll forgive the whole "Bengals fan" thing, because there isn't much of a rivalry there (except for week 4 of every preseason).  Besides, as everyone knows, I'm generally down with the 'Nati.  As long as Rob and company are wearing blue on Sunday night, that's all that matters.

I gave Rob some ideas, but seeing as how I haven't exactly 'been in town' in the past year, I figured it would be a good idea to open the floor to suggestions.  The great part about downtown Indy is that there is lots to do. If you have a good hangout spot or idea in Downtown, leave a comment.  Rob will be checking them.

Support your local economy, people, and help a brother out.

The War of 1812

Written by Nate Dunlevy on .

warof1812

Perhaps the most instensely debated issue in football over the past decade is whether Tom Brady or Peyton Manning is the NFL's premiere quarterback.  On Sunday night, the two QB's may meet for the last time in the 00's.  It could be the last chance for either of them to prove why they should be considered the top quarterback of their era.  There have been thousands upon thousands of words written on the subject.  Brady supporters point to his three Super Bowl titles.  Manning fans reply with Peyton's overal superior statistics.  Tom's backers counter that when Brady had the recievers, he broke all of Manning's records.  Peyton's camp retorts that when Manning had a supporting cast on par with Brady's he took the Colts to the Super Bowl.  It's a debate that may seemingly never end...

Until now!  It's pretty clear that when you compare the successing of Manning and Brady, you're left with a near tie.  However, what few people consider are the duo's flaws.  I mean, if you go 18-0 and then lose the Super Bowl, that's gotta detract a bit from your legacy.  Likewise, if you set the NFL record for touchdown passes in a season, only to watch your team get bounced out of the playoffs by only putting up three points, that's also pretty bad.  Today, two of Indy and New England's biggest fans will attempt to put the Brady/Manning debate to rest once and for all.  18to88.com will be posting an article highlighting Tom Brady's flaws.   FoxboroBlog.com will be countering with Peyton Manning's biggest downfall.  When it's all said and done, Dave of MoneylineLoser.com will get his long-time friend Peter King to judge each each quarterback point by point and finally declare once and for all who the QB of the Decade truly is!


18 to 88's Take on Tom Brady:

1. Most annoying in-game habit

Chilling on the sidelines drinking cocktails and schmoozing with Pat O'Brien.  Douche.

2. Worst press conference moment

"We're only going to score 17 points?" Brady said before chuckling about it. "OK. Is Plax playing defense? I wish he had said 45-42 and gave us a little credit for scoring more points."

Tom Brady-3 days before putting up 14 points in the Super Bowl.  Arrogant bastard.

3.  Lamest Advertisement

Oh no. No, no, no.

4. Worst Player Backed Up in College

Brian Griese.  Really Tom?  You had to see a sports psychologist because you couldn't beat out Brian Griese?

5. Lamest Photo

It's so hard to choose...

Goat lover?

Or cowboy lover?

6. Worst facial feature

His giant Ass Chin (not to be confused with a Giant Ass chin)

7. Wussiest Rule Change

The Brady Rule.  Oh no, big man.  Don't fall at my feet!  Oh, not my head either, that's too high!  Aim right in the middle there...ah, that's much better!

8. Biggest scandal

He sent his goons to shoot up some photojournalists at his Costa Rican wedding ceremony.  Massel Tov!  Nothing says, "My super model girlfriend and I will be together forever!" quite like attempted murder.


9.  Lamest Celebrity fan

Elton John.  Can you feel the love tonight?


Now that you've seen Tom Brady dissected, head over to FoxboroBlog.com to hear them rip Peyton Manning Apart!

Then take a trip to MoneylineLoser.com, where Peter King will put together all the pieces and declare our winner!

18 More Reasons to Hate the Patriots

Written by Luke Dunlevy on .

Because 88 just aren't enough

1.  The Tom Brady Rule.  It figures that a rule named after Tom Brady would serve to further emasculate football.

2.  Junior Seau is back again?  Didn't I just see him on a reality TV show?

3.  They've turned Randy Moss into a sure-fire first ballot Hall of Famer.  Do you really think the world is a better place because of that?

4.  Because despite an on going history of lackluster drafts, Belichick continues to be seen as a master of draft strategy.  Raping the Raiders on a regular basis doesn't qualify you as a genius...just as an honorary member of the AFC West.

5.  It's their fault the Wildcat is still around.  If they could have figured out how to stop it the first time, they could have saved all of us a lot of trouble.

6.  Throwing passes with a 59-0 lead.  That's just evil.

7.  The media assumed Joey Galloway was good just because the Patriots signed him.  Seriously, guys?  Joey Galloway?

8. Really?  Signing Fred Taylor?  Now you are just daring us to hate you.

9.  Matt Cassel confirmed our long-held suspicions. And yet the media acts as if 2008 never happened.

10.  I liked ESPNBoston.com better when it went by its original name: ESPN.com.

11.  After years of ridiculous taunts directed towards Manning we are supposed to have a begrudging respect for Brady? Not going to happen. Not ever.

12.  I can’t root for the Notre Dame Fighting Irish, a team I genuinely like, until Charlie Weis is forced out in disgrace.

13.  Tom Brady has way more in common with A-Rod than Manning ever will.

14.  Wes Welker.  I hate guys named Wes.  He should just play the game with a cardigan draped over his shoulders and be done with it.  Sometimes I root against Texas Tech just because he went there.

15.  Tom Brady and Randy Moss still playing "500" with 20 seconds to go in the Super Bowl.  Learn to throw an out-route, Tom!

16. This is really messed up: I wanted the Pats to make the playoffs last year.

17.  DZ’s secret G-chat friendship with our resident Pats fan, JC. For that matter: the fact that our website has a resident Pats fan.

 

18.  I don’t feel anything right now towards them. That scares me.

Stat of the year

Written by Nate Dunlevy on .

From CHFF's Week 9 Power rankings.

2. INDIANAPOLIS (8-0). Last week: 20-17 win vs. Houston. Amazing fact of the millennium: Of Indy's 11 current starters on defense, only rookie Jarraud Powers and DE Dwight Freeney were drafted higher than the fifth round.

That's a tad deceiving because Hayden will be starting when he comes back, but still...

UPDATE AND CORRECTION:  Remind me to always double check Colts facts given by CHFF.  Phillip Wheeler is now starting at LB.  He was a third round pick. So never mind...

CORRECTION #2:  Clint Session was a fourth rounder.  What the crap people.

Behind Enemy Lines

Written by Nate Dunlevy on .

I thought I'd take a break from the Colts/Pats nonsense to review one of the great movies of all time starring Owen Wilson.

Meh, who am I kidding?  There are no breaks from the War of 1812 this week, people.  It's wall to wall mayhem.  Here's the first of two collaborative efforts with Patriots Blogs.  I traded questions with Bruce at Patriots Daily.  You can read my responses to his questions here.  Here are my questions to him, with a recent revelation that occurred to me about the 2009 Pats tagged on at the end.

18to88:  1. The Pats rank just 20th in the league in Adjusted Sack rate.  I know they got a haul for Richard Seymour, but would they be better right now if he was still on the team?

PD:  Nope. Seymour was a tremendous player, but defensive line (and offensive line) seems to be a position that the Patriots are good at developing. Mike Wright has stepped in and played well, Jarvis Green is solid, and rookie Myron Pryor has been pretty good as well. I don't see that Seymour would've made a substantial difference in the results thus far. The Patriots pass rush has been slow to develop, but they're been bring more safety blitzes the last few weeks, with pretty good effectiveness.

18to88:  2.  We hear a lot of good things about the Pats rebuilt secondary.  What can you tell us about the back four?

PD:  It's more than four, really. Veterans Shawn Springs and Leigh Bodden were brought in to bring experience and stability to the position, and while Bodden has been pretty solid, Springs has seen his playing time diminish in recent weeks. Rookie Darius Butler has impressed with his speed and ball skills, while second year corner Jonathan Wilhite has started in place of Springs. We're very glad overall that the days of Ellis Hobbs and Deltha O'Neal are over.

The real revelation has been at safety where the two Brandons have made a huge impact. Third-year safety Brandon Meriweather has emerged as the top playmaker/ballhawk in the secondary, and even though a Boston writer said earlier this season that he is still closer to Donna Reed than Ed Reed, Meriweather has gotten better and better, and become a leader on defense. The other Brandon, McGowan, has become the Rodney Harrison-type hard hitting, close to the line safety that the Patriots really needed. He's been perhaps the biggest surprise of the season for the Patriots, and has put former starter James Sanders, who just signed a three-year extension in the offseason, on the bench. Rookie Pat Chung has had a sack from the safety position in each of the last two weeks, and has seen his playing time increase as well.

18to88: 3.  There are currently four teams with two losses in the AFC.  What does this game mean to the Pats?  How important is playoff positioning?

PD:  This game is huge to the Patriots. They really, really need it. Their two losses were both to AFC opponents, including Denver, so they can ill-afford another conference loss at this stage, especially with Pittsburgh getting their act together. The Patriots aren't the dominant road team that they were in the past, and really need to get as high a seeding as possible. They also need this game just to show that they are indeed once again a contender and to make a statement. It will be a tough assignment however.

18to88:  4.  NE is now #1 in offensive sack percentage after being 26th last year.  Has the line improved that much or did Cassel really just hold the ball forever?

PD:  Like most things, it's a bit of both. Like Manning, Brady has the ability to avoid the sack, either by throwing the ball away or shuffling around just enough in the pocket. Cassel was a young and inexperienced quarterback, who improved greatly as the season went on. Most of those sacks last year were at the beginning of the season when Cassel was still finding his way as a QB. On the line, they've back to the QB they've grown used to, and have protected him pretty well. Rookie Sabastian Vollmer has played for the injured Matt Light the last few weeks, and has done well, but faces a huge test this week against Freeney and Mathis.

18to88:  5.  How much does Randy Moss have left in his tank?  He's on pace for 98/1400/10 which is another great season, and similar to 2007 in all respects but TDs.  Why the scoring drop?

PD:  I think the TD's are bit low due to Brady's struggles in the first few weeks. Brady's accuracy was off in the early going, and he just flat-out missed Moss on a few plays that would've been TD's in the past. I think you'll see his TD numbers go beyond 10 by the time the season is over. He's got plenty in the tank, and while much of his game depends on his freakish physical abilities, Belichick and Brady have both called him the most intelligent receiver they've been around, which means he can out-think the defender as well.

18to88:  6.  Is it embarrassing having a "Brady Rule"?  Do you think it's a good change and will it actually help QBs or just punish defenders who are falling down and can't control where they land?

PD:  No more embarrassing than the "Chuck Rule" point-of-emphasis that Bill Polian had his all-powerful NFL competition committee push through following a Colts playoff loss to the Patriots.Seriously, if that had been Peyton Manning on the end of the Bernard Pollard lunge that wrecked Brady's knee, I think you'd have Colts fans in full support of the "Manning rule." I can tell you that the Patriots certainly haven't gained any benefit from this rule, though the publicity of the media and Ray Lewis' crying about Brady "asking" for calls would tell you otherwise. The Patriots have a lot more of these penalties called on them (not undeservedly, either) rather than for them.

18to88:  7.  Your prediction for Sunday?

PD:  I'm not quite sure the Patriots are ready to play at this level just yet. There are very few remaining Super Bowl veterans, and this is one of the first "big" games many of these guys have played. I'm going to go Colts 24, Patriots 16

My special thanks to Bruce at Patriots Daily. He's obviously a civil and level headed guy, which sucks because that means I can't say anything snarky to him. 

As I was pondering the Patriots secondary, it occured to me to list the QBs they've faced this year:
Trent Edwards, Mark Sanchez, Kyle Orton, Joe Flacco, Kerry Collins/Vince Young, Chad Henne, Matt Ryan, Josh Johnson.  The highest rated guy on the list is Flacco at 90.2.  Interesting.

A podcast and a plea for help

Written by Nate Dunlevy on .

18 Plays is up for the Texans game.  You can listen in the embedded player below, you can subscribe via Itunes, or you can just download it right here.

In a fit of drunken inspiration, resident Patriots fan JC wrote me with a nice idea.  Though I'm sure he won't remember doing so this morning, he suggested it would be "fun" to have fans share their favorite Colts/Pats game memories.  Though I don't usually go in for JC's ideas about "fun", in this case, I agree.  So if you have a favorite Colts/Pats experience (and it can be even an old school Colts/Pats game from before the Manning/Brady era), send it to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. (don't put it in the comments here).  I'll put together the best submissions and post them on Sunday morning.  If you contribute something we use and haven't yet gotten an official program from Super Bowl XLI, we'll send you one as a prize.  Someday, I'll run out of those and then who knows what we'll do.

Enjoy this game Sunday.  Sure, we'll play another one next year since there is little chance either team loses the division lead, but there are only so many of these clashes left.  In 20 years all people will remember about this decade is Brady/Manning.  Soak it all in.  These are special games.

State of the AFC

Written by Nate Dunlevy on .

Last night's Steelers/Broncos game provided some modicum of clarity at the half way point of the race.  Here's how I size up the contenders:

1.  Indianapolis-The Colts remind me a lot of last year's Steelers.  No run game, suspect line, great QB and defense.  The Colts defense passes my 'eyeball test'.  The offense does not.  This team needs get Gonzo and Brown healthy.  Assuming that happens, I think they represent the AFC in the Super Bowl.  They are two games clear of the rest of the conference, so you have to like their chances at a bye or #1 seed.  All other top contenders have two conference losses except Pittsburgh which lost a tough game with the Bears.   They have allowed the fewest points in football. They have scored the 5th most.  That's a great team.  The future schedule is doable:  NE, @Baltimore, @Hou, Denver.  If the Colts can split those four games, they'll go no worse than 13-3 on the season.

2.  Pittsburgh-They lost a fluky game to the Bears and at the gun to the Bengals.  They may be better than they were last year, as now they can almost sort of run the ball.  Anyone who watched them last night knows they are 100% legit.  Polamalu is a force on defense.  I'm not a little sad they aren't on our schedule this year. They beat the Vikings (fluky, I know, but that evens up that Bears loss), and have the third best point differential in the AFC.  They have a very manageable schedule and stand to win 13 games, if they can go 2-1 verses Cincy and Baltimore (with two games at home).  With one non-conference loss, they would force Indy to win 14 games to get the #1 overall seed.

3.  New England-I'm still not sure what to make of this team.  They've spent the better part of a month beating up the dregs of the NFL which masks some of the lackluster performances they've had.  There's not much need to dwell on it though, we'll find out soon enough what they are.  I don't think they are anything more than the third best team in the conference.  They do have the second best point differential (which tells us who a team really is) in football, but that 59-0 win over the Titans sort of tilts the table.  They are number one in DVOA as well, so I'm forced to conclude they are good.  My eyes have told me otherwise, but I haven't watched them closely in a few weeks.  They still play @Indy, @NO, @Mia, @Hou.  I can't see them finishing better than 12-4.

4.  Cincinnati-Don't sleep on the Bengals. They can run, pass and play good defense. They've gutted out some tough wins (and had a heart-breaker with Denver).  They've actually allowed fewer points this season than Pittsburgh.  It would tempt me to rank them higher, but they still play 5 of their last 8 on the road including @Pitt, @SD, @Minn, @NYJ.  I can't see them doing any better than a 12-4 finish at BEST.  DVOA doesn't think much of them right now, and they'll have to win some more of those close games to hang in the playoff fight.

5.  San Diego-Yes, I have them ahead of Denver.  It's the typical Chargers.  They start bad, then they get a bunch of winnable division games, and make a hard push for the playoffs.  I hate this team. I don't want to play them. I know that their point differential is one less than the Broncos though, and that they are moving in the right direction for the first time this season.  They have a brutal slate in front of them, though.  They have Philly at home, Denver on the road, and then @Dallas and Cincinnati.  11-5 would be a great record for them.  10-6 will win the division, if they can beat Denver.

6.  Denver-Not buying it. Orton is an utter fraud.  They put up 3 points on offense last night (could have been zero, but the Steelers dropped a pick on the first drive).  They have to play San Diego, NYG, @Indy, @Philly.  They'll probably drop another game to a sub par team because they'll have a game where they can't score 10 points.  The Chargers game is key.  If they can beat San Diego, they'll win the division. If they don't, they'll be forced to battle out the Texans for the final wild card spot.  I think they've been exposed the last two weeks, and won't be surprised at all to see them go into a tail spin.

Lurking:  Houston.  I don't think the schedule works out for them to win more than 10 games.

By the way, the top 6 teams in the AFC are a combined 11-1 verses the NFC (the top 6 in the NFC are 10-5 verses the AFC).

 

I've seen this somewhere before...

Written by Nate Dunlevy on .

The Colts offense seems to be struggling in recent games, and Demond found one of the reasons why.  He mentioned it to me the other day, and when I did the math to check his claim, I was stunned to see how right he was.

I want to present you two WRs.  Guess who they are. (update:  I've now included FO numbers through week 9)

WR 1
Games 8
Catches 27
Yards 320
TDs 3
DVOA: -22%
Catch rate: 47%
DYAR:  -42

WR 2
Games 8
Catches 27
Yards 376
TDs 2
DVOA:  -14.5%
Catch rate: 51%
DYAR: -6

Raise your hand if you think Marvin Harrison played well in 2008.  No takers?
Now vote if you think Pierre Garcon has played well in 2009.  I assume some of you have your hands up.

By now you've figured it out.  WR 1 is Marvin Harrison through 8 games in 2008.  WR 2 is Pierre Garcon this year.  Remember that with Garcon you also have to factor in the 7 penalties he's accured this season. 

Almost all the improvement in the Colts' offense has come from Wayne and Clark elevating their game.  Those two are producing at an incredible rate, but in terms of the third and fourth options, the 2009 Colts are almost identical to the 2008 squad.  Garcon is the spitting image of 2008 Marvin Harrison.  For the record, let's compare Collie and Gonzalez:

Gonzo:  34, 412, 3 TDs, 28% DVOA, 72% catch rate
Collie:  32, 356, 4 TDs, 10.1% DVOA, 67% catch rate

Collie has filled in wonderfully in the slot for Gonzalez.  Gonzo was a bit better, but virtually identical. Now it's clear he was a better than Collie, but still in the ball park.

We need to get Gonzalez back and get Garcon off the field.  I like Frenchy.  He's playing hard.  He's improving, but he's just not there yet. He's hurting the offense.  When the offense was really clicking early in the year, he had a positive DVOA.  Since week four, he's been on a consistant slide. 

Normally, comparing a WR to Harrison is a compliment.  Not so in this case.  Now we know why the Colts didn't bring Harrison back.

They already had his clone on the roster.

Top Stories