After reading Bob Kravitz' sensationalist article yesterday, I was planning on writing a full critique of the piece this morning. In short, the piece uses unnamed (biased) sources, makes wild assumptions, and makes logical argument that have no validity. However, after reading the pieces by Nate Dunlevy of 18to88 and Greg Cowan of Coltzilla, I've decided that another such piece is unnecessary. I encourage you to read those pieces for yourself, and make your own judgments from there. I will add one thing though, if I may. That is, for me personally, if a source is unwilling to put his name behind his claims, it's not worth trusting. Just my opinion. But, read Nate and Greg's breakdown of the article, and you'll be provided with a much clearer and more sound argument than just that.