Part Test, Part Announcement

Written by Nate Dunlevy on .

A couple of years ago I attended a professional conference aimed at educating executives to trends among emerging leaders under the age of 35.  Yes, I was one of the 'under 35s' invited to attend.  It struck me at the time that despite running my own website, blog, and podcast that I was already hopelessly out of date with new trends in technology.  At the time I didn't even have a Facebook account, and though I do now, I still don't really 'get it'.

I bring this up not whine about how insufferably old I am already (33 is the new 70), but rather to mention that while 18to88.com has had a limited Twitter presence for some time, I've finally gotten around to tying the RSS feeds for both the main page and the links into my Twitter account.  So now, for those so inclined, when you follow 18to88 on Twitter, you can be assured that you'll be getting real time updates about happenings here at 18to88.com.

I really wanted to tell you that...and I had to post something to test if it works.

So, sign up to follow 18to88.com by heading over to Twitter.com.  Hilariously, this is my feed, but it's under Demond's name.  Whatever, it works for both of us.

All Decade Fun from SI

Written by Nate Dunlevy on .

There's so much Colts related stuff here, that I'm putting this on the main page...

The All Decade Team features Manning, Howard Mudd, AV, and Polian

Toughest call, choosing Manning over Brady. Both deserve it. Brady gets the edge in titles 3-1. Manning gets the edge in MVPs 3-1 -- and he's in prime position to win a record fourth this year. Manning gets the edge in raw productivity, with 11,000 more passing yards and 87 more touchdowns. Brady played eight years, Manning 10. If I chose this team at the end of this season and the Patriots had won another title, I'd have to put Brady in this spot. But we're picking it now, and as we sit here, I believe Manning will go down in history as one of the top three quarterbacks, and I can't make a team of the decade, in Manning's prime years, without having him quarterback it. Manning is my Player of the Decade.

Don Banks lists the biggest moments

8. Tony Dungy's ring. Nearly two full decades after Doug Williams became the first African American to quarterback a Super Bowl champion, Dungy wrote his own chapter in history on Feb. 4, 2007, earning the distinction of being the first black head coach to win the NFL's ultimate game. Dungy's Colts beat the Bears in Super Bowl XLI, providing him the highlight of his eventual 13-year head-coaching career. He led his teams to the playoffs in 11 of those 13 seasons, and his legacy as one of the league's most respected figures stands in stark contrast today to the length of time he waited before being granted his first head-coaching opportunity, in Tampa Bay in 1996.

PLAYER OF THE DECADE: Peyton Manning, Colts
The Colts are the winningest regular-season team in the decade, and Manning's immense presence, skill, accuracy and mastery of the offense are the biggest reasons. Twenty years ago,
Fran Tarkenton was the all-time leader in passing yards, with 47,003. Barring some surprise in the last month of this regular season, Manning will finish 2009 with more than 42,000 in this decade alone. He is not the leader of his offense; he is the commandant.
Jim Trotter names the best games.  38-34 is #3
Tony Dungy and Peyton Manning finally answered their critics by earning their first trip to the Super Bowl. The fact that it came against their archnemesis -- and featured the largest comeback in championship game history -- made it all the sweeter. The game had many strange occurrences: two scores by offensive linemen off fumble recoveries, a touchdown catch by a defensive tackle, an interception return for a score and a kickoff return for a touchdown. Manning, who threw for 349 yards and a TD, marched the Colts 80 yards in the final two-plus minutes for the decisive score.

Mail Bagging

Written by Nate Dunlevy on .

Cleaning out my inbox today there are several cool things that I want to call everyone's attention to.

First, Robert I sends us this incredible link from NFL Films.  This is a MUST WATCH clip about the friend ship between Howard Mudd and Titans' D-line coach Jim Washburn.  Just an incredible video.

Secondly, I got an email from Hans Steiniger who is trying to visit all 31 NFL stadiums.  He made a return trip to Indy to take in the Luke.  He has a great write up about his day with the Blue Crew and seemed to really enjoy the Luke.

What struck me as most impressive about the Lucas Oil Stadium gametime experience was the crowd. The 12th man at Lucas Oil Stadium is easily top three in the league. Like many others throughout the NFL, they’re a loud, raucous crowd that supports their defense each time they take the field, supplying a wall of disruptive noise to force mistakes and confusion by opposing offenses. But what sets this crowd apart from the rest of the National Football League is the respect that’s paid to All-Pro quarterback Peyton Manning. Each time the Indianapolis Colts offense takes the field, the crowd silences allowing Manning and the Colts offense to work in an eerie noiseless environment … and I mean complete quiet. I could actually hear a camera shutter going off as a woman in the section over took photos.  She had to be forty feet away!  It’s as if the entire crowd takes a breath when the Colts approach the line of scrimmage. I really didn’t even feel comfortable talking to the guy next to me while Manning was under center, and I was in the last row of Section 613!   People seriously spoke in hushed tones during Colts offensive possessions, but as soon as the ball was snapped it was a completely different story, as this crowd springs to life with each exceptional play.

Moving along, there's some really exciting news from Bloguin about our site.  Bloguin has developed Iphone Apps for some of the bigger sites, including 18to88.com.  You can get the app for the Bloguin main site here.  The 18to88 was supposed to debut today, but the logo had to be redesigned because it had a horseshoe in it and couldn't get approved for copyright issues.  Hopefully, we'll be up and running in the next few weeks.  The app will allow you to easily check up on everything 18to88.com related from your IPhone or Ipod touch.  The next generation (hopefully coming early next year) will enable mobile commenting as well.  The best news of all...the App is FREE!  We'll keep you posted as to when the 18to88 App goes live.  There will also be Android applications for you non-Apple users.

Lastly, we've been blessed with some excellent photos from the official "drunk uncle" of the 18to88 family, JC the Pats Fan.  He attended the Pats/Dolphins game this past week and sends us photos along with this story:

I was so wasted by the time I got into the stadium that pretty much after that is a blur.

I will, however, send DZ a picture shortly that I'll hope he'll post, showing a Dolphin Fan who my crew provoked being arrested after throwing a punch at my chick.

I just sent DZ a picture of me WITHOUT my normal Memorial Day Tren/Deca stack.

I'll kill EVERYBODY who reads this blog in a cage match. EVERYBODY.

 

I blacked out the face off the offender because I don't want to get sued, and because I'm auditioning for a job as a face obscurer for COPS.  Back in the old days (ie the 1990s), there were more fights and arrests when the Dolphins came to the Dome than any other fanbase I remember.  One of my most vivid memories is of some drunk in a Marino jersey getting hauled out of RCA on a stretcher with a bloody and wearing handcuffs.  You stay classy, Miami.

Doing the things a Triangle Can

Written by Nate Dunlevy on .

To hear some talk about it, the Indianapolis Colts have been underachievers going on a decade now.

Seven 12 win seasons! Nine playoff appearances!  Just one Super Bowl!  They are the Atlanta Braves!

Now, I've never been sure exactly why calling a team "the Atlanta Braves" is an insult, but beyond that there's a major problem with that kind of analysis of the Colts.

They've rarely been as good as their record indicates.

For you long-time readers well versed in the concept of Pythagorean wins, skip ahead.  For you newcomers, there exists well established evidence that contrary to what Bill Parcels thinks, you aren't what you are.  It's been shown that because there is so much 'luck' in any given football game, that team records don't always reflect how well a given team has played.  Over time, a mathematical formula based simply on Points Scored and Points Allowed gives us a truer predictive measure of a team's quality than just using wins and losses.  An example:

The 2009 Jaguars are 7-5 and in the Wildcard picture.  Everyone who watches them realizes they aren't very good.  They have 6 of their 7 wins by less than a touchdown, and those all came over some of the worst teams in the league.  So, should we treat the Jags the same as the Patriots?  Both have 7-5 records.  They are what they are, right?  The big difference is that the Jags have been OUTSCORED on the season by 48 points and the Pats have outscored their opponents by 104 points.  Even taking into account that the Jags got blown out by Seattle and the Pats scored a 59-0 win, we can still see that on the whole, the Pats are better team than the Jags, and should naturally expect more from them.  "Pythagorean Wins" say that for predictive purposes, we should treat the Jags like a 5-7 team and the Pats like an 8-4 or 9-3 team.  The Jags have been a bit "lucky", the Pats a bit "unlucky".  Obviously, a blowout win or loss will skew the numbers early, but over time those tend to even out.  This is a well proven theory, so if it rankles, you I'm sorry.  It's football fact at this point.

So what does this have to do with the Colts?  For a decade now Indy has been one of the most consistent "over performers" in the regular season.  The Colts consistently win more games than they should (we'll talk about reasons for that shortly).  Take a look at this chart, bearing in mind that the first three seasons were "Mora Years":

Record Expected Record Difference (extra wins) Record of Best Playoff opponent Expected Record of Playoff opponent Difference (extra wins)
1999 13-3 10.2-5.8 +2.8 13-3 9.8-6.2 +3.2
2000 10-6 10.5-5.5 +0.5 11-5 11.2-5.8 -0.2
2001 6-10 6.5-9.5 -0.5 X X
2002 10-6 9-7 +1.0 9-7 8.6-7.4 +0.4
2003 12-4 10.6-5.4 +1.4 14-2 11.4-4.6 +2.6
2004 12-4 11.5-4.5 +0.5 14-2 12.4-3.6 +1.6
2005 14-2 12.7-3.3 +1.3 11-5 11.6-4.4 -0.6
2006 12-4 9.6-6.4 +2.4 13-3 12.7-3.3 +0.3
2007 13-3 12.5-3.5 +0.5 11-5 11.3-4.7 -0.3
2008 12-4 10.2-5.8 +1.8 8-8 10.2-5.8 -2.2

What can we learn from this chart?

1.  The Colts have been 'overrated' every single year this decade, except for the one year they missed the playoffs.  In no given year has Indy actually been 'as good' as their record would indicate.  Again, I'll try to answer the 'why' question in a moment.

2.  4 times, the Colts lost games to "inferior opponents" (1999, 2002, 2005, 2007).  Four times they lost to superior opponents, and when they won the Super Bowl, they did so beating three consecutive 'better' teams. The Colts played four teams that were actually better than their records indicated (2000, 2005, 2007, 2008).

3.  Of the games where they lost to "inferior opponents", the Pythagorean numbers show the teams were much more evenly matched than the records appeared.  In 2002, the Colts were basically a 9-7 team playing at an "8.4 win" team.  In 2005, instead of a 14 win team hosting an 11 win team, the Colts/Steelers game should have been seen like a "12.4 win team hosting an 11.6 win team".  In 2007, the Colts and Chargers were separated by three wins in the standings, but by only one Pythagorean win.  In other words, people thought the Colts were better than they should have.

4.  The most interesting game was last year's playoff game with the Chargers.  Indy was a 12 win team playing an 8 win team.  Anyone paying attention, however, would have seen that the matchup was dead even with both teams being 10.2 win teams.  In the end, it was decided by a coin flip in overtime.

Why do the Colts break the system?

Luck is supposed to even out.  No team is supposed to get 'lucky' every single year, but the Colts do.  Every year the Colts win more games than they "should".  Why?

1.  The Colts never lose a "trap game" or have a "let down game".    The last time the Colts lost a true 'trap game' (a game against a weaker team sandwiched between two better teams) was probably 2003 when they dropped a 28-23 game at 1-7 Jacksonville.  The Colts win every game they are supposed to win.  They are highly disciplined and don't make mistakes.  In other words, they make their own luck.  We've seen that all season.  "The Colts' way" forces opponents to beat themselves.  In the regular season against lesser teams, that is a massive advantage.  Against good teams in the playoffs the effect is lessened and the games come down to over all talent and the bounce of the ball.  More often than not, the Colts haven't been the more talented club in the playoffs.

2.  They sometimes let up in the 16th week.  Taking on a more lopsided loss than normal can affect a team's overall ranking.

3.  The Colts don't run up the score. You rarely see the Colts adding on garbage points, which helps to suppress their over all quality numerically.

4.  Indy has Peyton ManningHe has this habit of helping his team win games they shouldn't probably win.  It's a thing he does.  Maybe you've noticed?

What does this mean for 2009?

The good news:  Indy leads the AFC in Pythagorean wins.  They are second in the NFL to the Saints with an overall positive differential of +130 points.  The next closest AFC team is the Pats at +104, but we know they racked up 59 of those in just one game.  The Colts are the best team in the conference.

The bad newsThe Colts may not be as good as their record.  Pythag says Indy is really a 9.2-2.8 win team (call it 9-3 for fun).  San Diego and the Pats? They are 8.3 and 8.5 win teams.  In other words, the gap between the Colts and the rest of the conference isn't as big as it looks when reading the tables.  The numbers don't indicate that the 2009 Colts are among the best teams ever.

The best news:  We already know that the Colts have won some games they probably shouldn't have this year, or perhaps more accurately stated:  they didn't lose some games they could have.  What we've seen in the last few games from the running game and from Garcon means that the Colts are actually better now than they have been at any point this season.  All this plays into the reasons why all season we've been hammering home that the Horse had to get BETTER in order to win it all.  Sure, they were 6-0 or 7-0, but there were pretty obvious flaws that were bound to be exploited in the playoffs.  Now, the Colts are close to being a complete team, as long as they can keep this up and get Mathis and Freeney 100% at the same time, the Colts ironically may turn out to be exactly as good as their record indicates.

In the end, the important thing is to maintain perspective. Never just look at wins and losses and assume you know which team is better than another team.  I suppose we should be thankful that the NFL settles things on the field, instead of forcing us to parse through all this data so that we can guess who the two best teams are so they can play for some trumped up champion.

If the 2009 Colts are the best team in the NFL, they get the chance to prove it.  Just don't be surprised if the road ends up being a lot harder than you expect.

The Rest of the Story

Written by Nate Dunlevy on .

It's time.

We've fully dealt with the Titans game.  The hangover from the big win yesterday is wearing off (see, you can't avoid it.  I'm going to sneak that Hangover link in there on you someway or another.  There are some really good stats in there from the Colts' game this week).

Today's annoucement that the Colts clinch the #1 seed with a simple win over Denver means we can start to talk about what happens next.

We're finally going to start dealing with the thorny issues of rest vs. no rest and the quest for perfection.  Most of what I've read on this issue has been patently insane, misinformed, and just plain wrong.  There are several issues that are all getting wrapped up into one.  Let's try to make some sense of this mess by looking at each one separately.

1.  Should the Colts publicly embrace the pursuit of 16-0 by a decree from Caldwell to the media?

No.  Are you insane?  What possible good would that serve?

Look, we'll deal with how the Colts should handle the chance to go for 16-0 in a moment, but let's start with this awful notion that they should make some grand announcement that it's a goal. To do so would violate so many different bedrock beliefs of the team, it's laughable.

  • We play one week at a time. Oh, but now we are publicly stating that we are trying to win the next four weeks in a row now.  Why?  I don't know.  The media wants a story.
  • We don't care about the mediaOh, I mean unless they really pay a lot of attention to us and call us mean names.  Then we care.
  • Never give your opponent any materialOh, but since we are 12-0 we should piss off the Broncos by saying we are now going to beat the Bills in week 17It always pays to disrespect your next opponent by talking about up coming games.  That's exactly what helped us win 21 games in a row!
  • Stay focused on your goalsUnless another interesting goal comes along before you've actually secured your original goals.  It makes a ton of sense to stop thinking about getting the #1 and start thinking about 16-0 now!
  • Keep outside distractions to a minimum. Nah, let's start talking about something that will just up the media frenzy to a whole new level.  That would be so smart!

Right now, the media is ignoring the Colts (relatively speaking, of course) because they expect Indy to give up the ghost.  GREAT!  That's less insanity. The coaches are more sure the players are focused on them and them only.

Let's be clear:  the Colts should say NOTHING about 16-0 until they have to. They have a game against an 8-4 team this week. Then they play on the road, on Thursday night against a 7-5 team. Then they play a 6-6 team. What kind of insane coach would talk about 16-0 now?

Until you are 15-0, you don't discuss 16-0.

2.  Has resting players in the final week hurt the Colts in the playoffs before?

NO. NO. NO.  A thousand times no.

The most common theme I've seen is, "The Colts have struggled in the playoffs.  The Colts rest players.  Therefore the Colts should not rest players".

There's just one problem:  The Colts haven't rested players that many times.

I wrote on this last year, but let's cover it again:

1999 Colts play starters in an ultimately meaningless game in Buffalo (WHOOOOA KARMA ALERT!).  Cornelius Bennett gets hurt.  Colts lose their first playoff game.

2000 Colts can't rest.  Colts lose in round one.  The loss has NOTHING to do with resting players.

2002 Colts can't rest.  Colts lose in round one.  The loss has NOTHING to do with resting players.

2003 Colts can't rest.  Colts blow out Denver in round 1.

2004 Colts REST STARTERS.  Colts blow out Denver in round 1.  Seeing as how the week 16 opponent was...Denver, I'd say rest was the right strategy there.

2005 Colts rest 10 starters verses the Chargers in week 14 and lose.  They then barely play the starting offense at all for two weeks, and then Tony has his family tragedy.  Then they have to play a really good Pittsburgh team and lose thanks to a miracle tackle and a shanked field goal.  I can buy the idea that resting the offense for two weeks before a bye contributed to the slow start.  Of course, that slow start might have had a little to do with the O-line not having any idea how to protect the QB, but whatever.  I think this game has more to do with the off the field events, but for the sake of argument, I'll allow that two weeks off was way too much down time.  File that away.

2006 Colts can't rest.  Colts win Super Bowl.  Note that two other times they couldn't rest and they didn't win the Super Bowl, so don't go all crazy about the one time they did.  It's the team, not the circumstances.

2007 Colts rest starters for three quarters.  Colts lose to San Diego.  Please, the next time anyone brings up 2007 in this discussion, you have my permission to smack them in the head and call them a moron.  First, the 2007 Colts were WRACKED with injuries come the last game.  They needed the rest.  Robert Mathis managed to come back for the playoff game, but wasn't himself.  The Colts offense?  It started out on fire in this game. First drive: TD.  The defense then picked off Rivers.  The Colts were driving for a second score when Harrison fumbled.  Now, you can say the Colts screwed up by bringing Marv back. I won't argue.  He needed game reps and clearly wasn't ready to play and hurt the team that day.  Resting the last week of the season didn't stop Indy from getting pressure on Rivers.  Resting the last week of the season didn't make the defense fall apart to Billy Volek.  It didn't make Tony Ugoh melt down in the fourth quarter against Merriman.  It didn't make Dallas Clark drop the final pass which hit him in his heavily wrapped hand.  People can say what they want about 2005, but there is NO EVIDENCE that rest had anything to do AT ALL with this loss.

If someone brings up 2007, ask them one simple question:  "Exactly how were the Colts hurt by resting in that game?  Did they start slow?  Did they not have the lead in fourth quarter?  What aspect of the game would have been different if they had played starters against the Titans two weeks earlier?"

2008 Colts rest some players for 3 quarters to a half.  They then have to travel cross country and play 6 days later in San Diego where they ultimately lose in overtime because the defense just finally wears down.  Again, Indy had the lead in the fourth quarter, but couldn't pick up two yards when they had to because Gijon Robinson forgot a snap count.  This same Gijon Robinson did play plenty in the previous game.  So again, tell me how playing everyone with a big lead over the Titans would have turned this game?

Most everyone bases the entire "rest hurts" argument on 2005 and 2007.  2005 is arguable.  2007 is utterly irrelevant.  Oh, and there's 2004, but no one ever wants to bring that up.

3.  So, should the Colts rest players?

Yes, they should rest players.

It's only a question of how much.

I think it was a mistake to shut things down so early in 2005.  I don't think that's why they lost, but it didn't seem necessary.  People forget that several defensive starters sat against the Chargers (Brackett for one, I think).  That was basically three weeks off plus the bye week.  A month without a game is just too long.  Taking one week off is no big deal.  Taking four...that could be another story.

The tough part of the equation is deciding what to do with the Jacksonville game.  It's a short week.  It's a meaningless game, but you can't shut it down.  It would be a full month before the Colts play again.  I think you have to judicious against the Jags, but play full tilt through the Jets game at least.  There's rest and there's rust.  I don't think rust sets in by taking part of one game off.  It could if you don't play for a month.  Indy needs to be playing starters at least three quarters through the 15th game.  The 16th game...that's another story.

Week 17 is an outdoor game on January 2nd in Buffalo.  That could be a dangerous environment to try and play.  Cold, ice, wind, ect.  The last time they tried that, it cost them a starting linebacker.  I'm not willing to sacrifice Gary Brackett on the altar of momentum.  Letting guys take some rest in that last game only seems sane.  Dwight Freeney is banged up.  Robert Mathis was in street clothes at the end of Sunday's game. Kelvin Hayden has been battling injuries all year.  We can't win the Super Bowl if those guys aren't playing.  Rest only makes sense.

Ah, but having said that...

4.  What if the Colts are 15-0 in three weeks? Should they still rest players?

No.

Here's why:  a streak is not like other things in sports.  When on a streak, you don't talk about it.  You don't plan for it.  You just ride it out.  I'm on the record as saying the Colts need to play straight up through their 15th game no matter what.  Obviously, you don't risk questionable players, but as much as possible, you keep your foot on the gas. And if everything goes just right and all it takes is one more win to go undefeated...

You have to go for it.

An undefeated Colts team would be known as the Greatest Team of All Time.  I know the '72 Dolphins aren't, but the Colts aren't the '72 Dolphins.  This is the team with a massive win streak.  This is the team that has the most wins in a decade.  This team has Peyton Manning at QB.  This team would be utterly and forever immortalized as the greatest team of all time. Manning would cement his status as the greatest QB ever.  The Colts as a franchise love history.  They won't be able to turn their backs on it.

Given the choice between two more Super Bowls or one 19-0 perfect season...I'd take the one perfect season.  It's that big a deal.

As foolish as it is for the Colts to address the issue now, it's just as foolish to turn your back on history.  You can't live life terrified something will go wrong.  If there is nothing to gain, you rest players against the Bills, but 16-0 doesn't qualify as "nothing".  It is most definitely something.

The 2007 Pats helped everyone.  There is no longer so much 'weight' to being 16-0 heading into the playoffs.  No one will just assume you are going to win.  I think they forever took the edge off for any team that comes after them.

If the Colts are 15-0...

If the Colts are healthy...

If there is no freak blizzard or -10 F temperature in Buffalo on January 2...

Then hell, yes.  Let's go undefeated.

The Greatest Team Ever.

It has a nice ring to it.

Let's make history.

Getting in the Groove

Written by Nate Dunlevy on .

Indy was the better football team on Sunday.  Sometimes, it's just that simple...

Reasons to Smile:

  • Pierre Garcon-Uh, wow.  In his last three games he has 17 catches for 307 yards. He was a monster in the first quarter on Sunday.  He has turned the corner right before our eyes.  It's like that TD he scored against the Pats baptized him in victory, and he hasn't been the same since.  Let's imagine that Gonzo could play right now.  How does he get on the field?  At 100%, I don't doubt he'd be better than Collie, but I don't see how he can be anything more than a fourth WR for this team this year.  Garcon is simply playing too well to take off the field.  He's in the process of making the kind of jump you usually see guys make in the offseason.  He's a real threat on every play, and I think you'll see the O open up from here on out. 
  • Clint Session.  He just continues to pound people.  Outstanding play to force a fumble today.
  • The run game is absolutely credible.  It's not flashy, but teams have to respect it.  That's all you need.
  • Taking over with 10 minutes and change and handing the ball back with 7 minutes and two timeouts wiped off the clock in the fourth quarter.  Oh, and a FG.
  • Taking over with :20 in the half and getting three points
  • Reggie Wayne doesn't get down.  He just bides his time and makes huge plays when it counts.
  • Just 5 penalties for 40 yards.  One of those was utter nonsense (the Lacey interference).
  • The Titans played our WRs physical and the Colts still posted 27 points.
  • Great, active play by the defensive line.  They did a great job containing both Young and Johnson.
  • Ugoh did a credible job filling in.  He did not play great by any means and made some mistakes, but if you think of him as a back up LT and realize that he allowed no sacks, and the Colts ran the ball well, then it was a plus.  Watching him, CJ, and Diem makes me realize that the Colts are going to have to draft some more tackles this year.
  • Jacoby Lacey as the nickle back. Hayden's return makes this team that much better.

Reasons to Frown:

  • Ron Winter's gang of clowns.  Totally inconsistent job of calling penalties.  They let both sides be rough, but then flagged Lacey for nothing.  They need a clinic on how to spot the ball.  The first Titans first down was spotted a full half yard ahead of where the runner landed.  Awful job today.
  • Field that kick, Clark.
  • Powers getting beat by Washington.  I thought they threw at him a lot more today because Hayden was back.  He was stone cold beat, and is lucky Washington flubbed the play.
  • 50 yard field goals are about 60% propositions in the NFL.  What are our chances of hitting one this year?  10%?  It's a major weakness. It might be the only one this team has anymore.

Best Call:

Sending pressure on Young all day.  I'm normally conservative when it comes to blitzing, but it's clear that Young still panics when under pressure.  He seemed to have a hard time standing in the pocket and making throws when guys were running at him.  He airmailed some balls he didn't have to.  I thought Young played pretty well, and he has a cannon, but he wasn't ready for the Indy blitz.

Worst Call:

Punting on fourth and 2 from the 46. I realize that it worked out as Young threw a pick to Lacey, but after just recovering a fumble at roughly that same spot, why not go for it?  If you don't make it, you haven't lost anything. If you do make it, you have the chance to bury a division rival.  I'll never be ok with punting there.

Reasons I'm Flying:

  • Freeney got another sack.  That's a good sign.
  • This team feels like it's just now starting to gel.  The 2009 Colts will be scary good when they hit their stride.
  • The Colts are one win from a bye.  It's almost playoff time.
  • Brett Favre is throwing picks like candy tonight.  Unless he brings the Vikes back, it's a two man MVP race.  First to 16 wins.

Reasons I'm Dying:

  • Mathis in street clothes
  • CJ not playing left the Colts with just two tackles.  That can't be a good thing.
  • The Jags will be hyped up for the Thursday night game.  Their schedule just keeps being too easy for them to go away, no matter how bad they are.
  • The kicking situation.  If our season comes down to a 48+ yard FG...I can't think about it.
  • New England and San Diego back to back.  I know the Pats are in free fall and can't win on the road, but still.

The Bottom Line:

No mistakes.  No turnovers.  No excuses.  No losses.

The Colts are a more mature, more complete, more talented team than the Titans.

They won.

They should have.

We're Just Better Than You

Written by Nate Dunlevy on .


no comments

Titans at Colts Game Blog

Written by Nate Dunlevy on .

PREGAME:

CJ is out.  Freeney is active.  So Ugoh and Diem are the only tackles on the Colts roster to my knowledge today.  Yikes.  Hope no one gets hurt.  By the way, make sure to check out the article in the Links about the NFL ending revenue sharing.

FIRST QUARTER:

  • Indy opens the game with the ball at the 25 after a return by Simpson.  Things get off to a rip-roaring start as Collie tips a ball that Garcon hauls in for 27 yards.  On third and 6, Manning hits Frenchy for 36 yards inside the 10.  Addai converts it immediately with a spinning TD run for 8 yards.  7-0 Colts in 5 plays and 75 yards.  BAM.  1:58.  Incredible.
  • The Titans first drive is extended after a HORRIBLE spot on third down gives the Titans an undeserved first down.  It looked like the official gave Chris Johnson a half yard more than he actually got.  It looked like Caldwell should have challenged the spot. The Colts didn't force another third down until the Titans had driven down to the two yard line.  Young threw wildly on third down, and the Titans settle for a field goal as Young limps off the field, 7-3 Colts.
  • Hey! It's a "big" return for Simpson.  The Colts start their second drive at the 35, but go three and out as the Titans played the Colts physical.  It looked like there was clearly a missed PI call on third down.  Ah, Mike Winters.  Your crew is just stellar, as usual.
  • The Titans help out the Colts by dropping a sure TD pass, and after driving out near midfield, Freeney got home on third down and brought down Young to force a Titans punt.  Huge play by 93.  The Colts will start at the 23.
  • Diem starts the drive with a false start, but Manning shrugs it off by dropping a perfect pass in on Frenchy who makes an incredible catch after absorbing contact.  99 yards receiving already for Garcon.  Addai gets horse collared for a 15 yard penalty moving the ball into scoring range at the Titans 33 as the quarter ends.  The first quarter was a successful one for the Colts.  A TD here would really put pressure on the Titans to match them score for score.

SECOND QUARTER:

  • Manning completes a clutch pass to Clark on third and 12 for a first down near the 20.  Again at the 10, he hits Joe for a spinning, diving first down at the 1.  Joe plows home for his second score.  He has played an incredible game already today.  14-3 Colts.
  • The Titans immediately attack as Young hits a big 25 gain to Britt.  Say what you will, his deep ball accuracy has been excellent all day.  Then Session comes up large forcing a fumble by Hall after a short screen.  Foster recovers and Indy starts with the ball at midfield.  Another TD would go a long way to changing the way the Titans have to play this game.
  • GUTLESS! The Colts can't pick up the first down on third and two as Clark drops a pass, and Caldwell punts from the Titans 46.  Horrible decision.
  • Johnson picks up four yards on third and three to help get the Titans across the 20.  Young then makes a good throw on the next third and 6 for a first down. After blanketing the Titans WRs, the Colts forced yet another third down.  They blitz Young, and Freeney forces him out of the pocket.  Lacey jumps the route for a pick and the Colts get the ball at roughly the spot they punt from.  It worked out for Caldwell again.  I still don't like it.
  • Addai continues his strong running, but Ron Winter's crew has apparently forgotten how to spot the ball.  They short Joe by a few inches, forcing a third and short.  Joe doesn't seem to mind though and pounds the ball down to the 30.  Hart and Garcon got the ball inside the five, but Diem and Ugoh false start to move the ball back.  Manning pays it no nevermind, however, drilling Collie for a huge TD to go up 21-3.  This was a huge score because the Titans have the "two for none" with the last possession of the first half and the first of the second half.  The defense needs to stay strong, or this will be a game again real quick.
  • Massive fail by the defense.  After an initial stop causes the coaching staff to call a very aggressive timeout (hoping to force a punt with time left to score), the Titans rip right through the D as Young fires bullets all over the field, eventually getting a TD with :21 to play to cut the score to 21-10.  The Titans start the second half with the ball, and this could be a game before the Colts ever see the ball. I'm all for aggression, but why call that timeout on defense if you aren't willing to go for fourth and short on offense?    I don't like the mixed messages.
  • Maybe I spoke too soon.  The Titans squib the punt, and Manning makes them pay.  First he hits Garcon all the way down to the Titans 45.  Then after an incomplete pass, Kyle DeVan baits Brown of the Titans into an unsportsmanlike conduct penalty.  The 15 yards moves the ball inside the 30.  Addai plows down to the 25, setting up a 42 yard field goal try.  Stover drills the kick, and Indy leads 24-10 at half time.  Incredible.  Manning (and DeVan) just cut the heart right out of the Titans.  Spectacular drive.

HALF TIME:

As the game starts to get chippy, the Colts are firmly in control.  The game is by no means in the bag, but VY will be under a lot of pressure in the second half.  The Colts offense has barely been slowed by the Titans, as Manning has posted a rating of 101 and 176 yards and the run game has been active and effective all day as Addai already has 44 yards rushing.  Ironically, the timeout Caldwell called that allowed the Titans to get into the endzone (instead of a field goal), gave Indy the time needed for a field goal.  I suppose that's a net loss of one point.  No big deal.

THIRD QUARTER:

  • Fine job by the D.  Chris Johnson gets some yards, but when VY is forced to pass, the Colts do an excellent job getting pressure on Young and the Titans have to punt. The Indy offense will be looking to score again, but also drain some clock.  We should see a lot of Hart and Simpson before this over.
  • The Colts mount a productive, but ultimately frustrating drive.  They got inside Titans territory, but a holding call on Reggie Wayne and a blown up screen put the Colts in a 3rd and 25 hold.  Manning got much of it back, setting up a 52 yard FG try on 4th and 11 by Stover who yanked the kick. It was a tough position to be in, and now the Titans have great field position.
  • Ron Winter's boys strike again.  The Colts looked like they had the Titans stopped, but Jacob Lacey picked up a very weak PI call on third and three to keep the drive alive.  The Colts are clearly missing Robert Mathis in the pass rush, as the Titans moved the ball down to the one.   Then they imploded.  A timeout, a fumbled snap, a holding penalty, and a completed passs out of bounds and the Colts fend off yet another first and goal from the one.  In the end, that drive cost the Titans more than 6 minutes of game time and a timeout and they got nothing. 
  • The Colts take over at the two, and Addai BARELY gets the ball out of the endzone on first down.  Manning throws incomplete on second down, setting up third and 11 on the one.  On third and long, Manning barely avoids the sack, and hits Wayne near the first down marker.  He gets (another) horrible spot however, and Indy will have to punt as the quarter ends.  Ultimately, you have to consider the third quarter a 'win' for the Colts.  The score stands exactly as it did at the end of the first half, and when you have a 14 point lead, that's a good thing.  The Titans will get the ball back in great field position, so the D needs another good stand here.

FOURTH QUARTER:

  • The Titans take over at the Colts 40.  Holding them to a field goal would be a major accomplishment for the defense.  The Colts almost came up with that stop, but sloppy tackling on Kenny Britt on third down gave the Titans the first.  Again, the D rises up, however, stopping the Titans with a jail house blitz (that does not come CLOSE to landing) that oddly rattles Young who tosses the ball wildly on fourth down.  The Colts take over having wasted 4 more minutes of game time.  Incredible performance by the D.  This game is perfectly illustrating the good and bad of Vince Young.
  • The Colts go on an excellent "play from ahead" drive, as Manning completes key third downs to Addai and two more to Wayne and the Colts methodically kill the Titans dreams of victory.  Indy burns more than 7 minutes of game clock, both remaining Titans' timeouts and put 3 points on the board (making it a three score game). That is how you win playoff games, people.  Killing the clock with a lead.  Tremendous game for the Colts on all fronts.
  • No sooner do I congratulate the team, than Kenny Britt rips off a 55 yard return to give the Titans the faintest of heart beats.  Young eventually hits Scaife for the third longest TD against the Colts all year (18 yards).  The Colts still manage to force them to use half the remaining clock to do it.  All Indy has to do is recover the onside kick and the game is over.
  • Nope.  Clark muffs the onside kick, the ball squirts loose and the Titans get the ball back.  How big was that last field goal by Stover? 
  • No harm.  Four plays, lots of pressure, and Young just flings the ball wildly every time.  Great win.  Dominant performance.

Who to Root For: Week 13

Written by Nate Dunlevy on .

The Colts have nearly locked up the one seed, so now's the time to remind you all about our dream order for finish for the AFC:

1.  Indy
2.  San Diego
3. New England
4.  Cincinnati
5.  Denver/Jacksonville (do you care?  I don't)
6. Pittsburgh

This would force the Pats to play Pitt, and @SD.  It would force the Chargers to play the Pats.  Obviously, you could flip the Pats and Chargers and it would be nearly as good.  It would likely give Indy a second round game with the Bengals or Broncos.  Most importantly, it means Indy likely would only have to face one of the Steelers/Pats/Chargers combo.

EASY CALLS:

Lions at Bengals
Chargers at Browns
These first two games are not going to go our way, but they would help the Colts clinch the one seed.  I don't much care what San Diego does the rest of the year, as I assume they'll take the two seed (which is fine with me).  It would be nice to get the Bengals behind the Pats because we certainly don't want to have to play New England in the divisional round

Ravens at Packers

I don't think the Ravens are that great a team, but I'd just as soon have them out of the playoffs

Oakland at Pittsburgh

If the Steelers don't make the playoffs, I won't cry

TOUGH CALLS:

Texans at Jaguars

This game likely won't matter, but I'd rather the Jags lose their next two games so as to not have any real hope when Indy comes to town in a couple of weeks.

Patriots at Dolphins

It's distasteful, but I think we have to pull for the Pats to finish 12-4.  I'd much rather them wind up in the two or three seed than in the four.  That means they have to win out.  I'll hate myself just a little, but here's hoping they pull it out.

Broncos at Chiefs

As a general rule, I'm rooting against all playoff contenders (Broncos, Jags, Steelers, and Ravens).  The Broncos will be equally desperate next week regardless of what happens today, so I'd rather they lose.

Getting Better, Part 3

Written by Nate Dunlevy on .

In this final installment, we'll compare the 2008 Colts to the 2009 edition by looking at special teams and coaching.

SPECIAL TEAMS:

Place Kicking:  If there is one area the 2009 Colts are dramatically weaker in this year, it's in the area of place kicking.  Vinatieri has battled the effects of off season hip surgery since training camp, and is still not active.  Matt Stover has taken over and performed adequately.  The numbers seem to show some improvement, but they are a bit misleading.  The 2008 Colts hit 80% of their FGs and had a DVOA of -2.9%.  The 2009 Colts have hit 81.3% and have a DVOA of -1.6%.  I still say the Colts were better off last year.  This season, Indy has hit zero FGs of 50 yards or more, whereas they hit two in 2008 (including a game winner over the Pats).  Vinatieri also nailed a game winner against San Diego.  Stover simply doesn't have that kind of range any more, and I have little confidence in him.  The numbers say the Colts are touch improved, but the naked eye says they are worse.  If there is one giant achilles heel on this team, it's the place kicking.  We've had too many seasons undone by a crappy kicker (2000, 2004, 2005).  One more could kill me.

Kickoff Coverage:  The 2008 Colts dramatically improved their kick coverage, but the 2009 have taken it to a new level with Pat McAfee handling the duties this year. DVOA says the Colts went from a solid 2.4% to a stunning 12.4% (second in the NFL this year).  McAfee already has more touchbacks (14) this season than AV did all of last year (8).  He has revolutionized the Colts coverage game as he booms the kicks high and deep.  As much as fans loved to complain about the coaching of the coverage units, the real problem was the lack of distance and hang time on the kicks.  Indy has improved dramatically in this respect.

Kickoff Returns:  Yuck.  Chad "the Human Touchback" Simpson continues to do a good job of not fumbling each week.  Unfortunately, little else is going right in the return game.  I suppose it's still technically an improvement over 2008 when the Colts posted a DVOA of -9.0% (29th in NFL).  This year, they are up to -6.5%.  Simpson is averaging 21.3 yards a return this season, which is down from last year when he and Frenchy took turns and posted similarly mediocre averages of 22.9 and 21.6 yards a return respectively.  Honestly, there has been no real change in this department this season.

Punt Returns:  Copy and paste.  There's been a DVOA improvement (-10.2% to -4.9% this year), but the effect hasn't been noticeable.  Ratliff averaged 5.6 YPR last year, and Rushing has done most of the work this season and stands at 5.7 YPR.  It's basically been a rerun.

Punting: One of the big questions this offseason was how rookie Pat McAfee would do replacing long time Colt Hunter Smith.  The answer is:  pretty well. DVOA loved Smith's ability to pin teams deep and rewarded the 2008 Colts with a rating of 9.0%.  That number has fallen off this year with McAfee scoring a still positive 1.3%. More traditional numbers help McAfee a little as he averages 44.7 yards per punt compared with Smith's 44.2 yards.  Smith had a net of 38.8 Yards per punt with 23 inside the 20 with only two touchbacks and 11 fair catches.  McAfee's net is down a little (37.7), with 14 inside the 20, 3 TBs, and 10 fair catches.  In other words, he hasn't quite mastered Smith's ability to kill the ball deep, but has done a good job forcing fair catches.  In all, there's a slight drop off from Smith to McAfee when punting from the 50 in, but McAfee more than makes up for it with his kickoff work.

Summary:  DVOA likes the 2009 Colts a little more than the 2008 version (0.2% up from -1.9%).  That means Indy has gone from slightly below average to average.  They are a little worse in two phases (kicking and punting), the same in returns, and dramatically improved in kickoff coverage.  If Vinatieri comes back healthy and can hit some 50 yard field goals, that will go a long way to helping my confidence in the 2009 Special Teams.

COACHING:

2008 was one of the finest coaching jobs I've ever seen as Dungy took a rattled, beat up team and gave them hope and kept them focuses and afloat long enough for things to start going right.  The 2008 Colts battled a massive wave of injuries and made the playoffs posting a series of tough comeback wins.

The 2009 Colts have battled a wave of injuries losing Sanders, Jackson, Gonzo, and Vinatieri for most of the year.  Jim Caldwell and company have kept the Colts focused and prepared.  They've shown no let down after big wins.  They battled tough scheduling problems (back to back road night games in 6 days).  They've beaten the dregs.  They've handled the 'BIG GAME' against the Pats.  They never panic and can't be counted out until the clock hits zero.  The offense has shown new wrinkles as has the defense. Caldwell has consistently shown a willingness to go for it on fourth down, as evidenced by his bold attempt in Indy territory this past Sunday.  His team is locked in, focused and motivated.

Most importantly, the Colts have thrived with rookies in key positions.  Austin Collie.  Jerraud Powers. Jacob Lacey.  Pat McAfee.  Donald Brown.  If this coaching staff wasn't competent, it would show.  There are too many young players playing too well to just chalk all the wins up to Manning doing his thing.  The Colts coaches have done a great job putting the young men in positions where they can have success, and the rewards have been evident.

There is only one number you can use to truly see how a coaching staff is performing.  This year, that number is 11-0.

2008 was one of the great coaching performances ever in Indianapolis.  2009 has been just as good.

OVERALL SUMMARY:

My gut told me the 2009 Colts had improved.

The good news is that they have.

They pass better.  They run better. They stop the pass better.  They stop the run better. Their special teams are a little improved.  The coaching has been flawless.

This team is simply better than the over-achievers of 2008.  The biggest potential weakness is in the kicking game.  We'll just have to hope and pray that AV comes back ready to hit more playoff winning kicks.

Top Stories